"Evolution is fact, fact, fact!"

This is basic mind control, endless repetition.

_________________________

The eternal debate about Darwinian evolution always devolves into the specious argument that *selection* solves all design problems.  Yes, mutations may be random, but *selection* is merely pseudoscience.  Evolutionary biologists have used computer programs pretending to simulate *selection*.  Their exercises do nothing of the sort.  

Wordle is a popular new daily quiz which gives players six chances to reason, or "select" the Word of the Day.  Only common nouns are permitted and the six blocks vibrate "NO" if you type five letters which do not form a word in the English dictionary.  This is equivalent of the *selection* process in Darwinian evolution because to be *selected* the random mutation must confer a demonstrable advantage to the organism.  This is very much like being a real word in the Wordle game.  It examines and selects correct letters as gold, correct letters in the correct location as green, and incorrect letters as dark gray.  Wordle gives you six tries with real words, of the approximately 171,000 five-letter words listed in the 20-volume set of the Oxford English Language Dictionary.

Thinking gamers almost always reason their way to the solution, often well before the sixth attempt.  This is the beauty of intelligence, which cannot be present in Darwinian evolution.  It has no goal, no power of reason as we do.

Feb 3, 2023

Feb 26, 2023

April 16, 2023

April 19, 2023

        

__________

Pick five letters at random.  The probability of randomly typing a five-letter word is 171,000 five-letter common words/26x26x26x26x26 or 171,000/308,915,776 which is 1 chance in 1,806.  That is just ANY word, not THE word.  The probability of you, an intelligent person, selecting this first word correctly 1 in 171,000.

Statistically, this means that you should expect a random program to require 1,806 tries to type any word.   Every single time it fails to produce THE CORRECT word, it can only randomly change one or more of the incorrect letters, but which ones, and how?  Randomness is an extremely poor methodology, because random mutation has no goal, no objective.  Human thinkers do.  And we often get the correct answer on second, third, or fourth tries.

In conclusion, human thinkers solve Wordle quickly and easily.  Darwinian *selection* could not solve any Wordle in tens of thousands of random attempts, and *selecting* a five-letter word is incredibly simpler than *selecting* the precise series of amino acids, out of 20 different amino acids in humans, all of which are the L not the D enantiomer, and bonded together with peptide bonds rather than non-peptide bonds, thousands of consecutive times, to construct over 20,000 different polypeptides in the human body, up to a total length of 38,183 amino acid residues in length, in the case of titin, the largest protein in your body.

The probability of the naturalistic synthesis of titin is less than 1 chance in 10 to the 72,578th power.

(1/20 to the 38,183 x 1/2 to the 38,183 x 1/2 to the 38,183.)

Impossible was defined by the authoritative statistician, Emile Borel, as 1 chance in 10 to the 50th power.   ( https://quotefancy.com/emile-borel-quotes )

Proof of Volume of 10 to the 50th Marbles one cm in Diameter

There are 100 marbles per meter, and 100 times 1,000 per kilometer.

Therefore 10  to the 5^th marbles cubed equals 10 to the 15 marbles per cubic kilometer.

 

The volume of earth is about 1.083 x 10  to the 12 cubic kilometers.  

10 to the 15 marbles/cubic km x 1.083 x 10 to the 12 cubic kilometers/earth =1.083 x 10  to the 27 marbles to fill earth sized sphere.

10 to the 50  marbles / 1.083 x 10^to the 27 marbles/earth size sphere = 9.234 x 10^to the 23 earths full of marbles, which is to say 923,400,000,000,000,000,000,000 (923,400 billion billion) earths full to search and find the unique marble on your first and only try.  Personally, I would call it impossible to find that unique marble in just one earth-sized sphere full of them.