Posts

Image
  "Evolution is fact, fact, fact!" This is basic mind control, endless repetition. _________________________ The eternal debate about Darwinian evolution always devolves into the specious argument that *selection* solves all design problems.  Yes, mutations may be random, but *selection* is merely pseudoscience.  Evolutionary biologists have used computer programs pretending to simulate *selection*.  Their exercises do nothing of the sort.   Wordle is a popular new daily quiz which gives players six chances to reason, or "select" the Word of the Day.  Only common nouns are permitted and the six blocks vibrate "NO" if you type five letters which do not form a word in the English dictionary.  This is equivalent of the *selection* process in Darwinian evolution because to be *selected* the random mutation must confer a demonstrable advantage to the organism.  This is very much like being a real word in the Wordle game.  It examines and selects correct letters
Post a Comment
Read more
      johnjaeger Thu 9/14/2023 11:35 AM Hi John—   Your critique of the Dawkins weasel demonstration found its way to me, and I agree with it entirely. I offered my own critique in  Undeniable  (p198-200). You hit the nail on the head! Regrettably, even solid refutations of evolutionary arguments like this don’t seem to get their proponents to rethink their position. I’ve become convinced that this is because the root problem is spiritual, not scientific or intellectual. Best regards, Doug Axe Douglas Axe, PhD Rosa Endowed Chair of Molecular Biology Professor of Computational Biology Co-Director of Stewart Science Honors Program School of Science, Technology & Health Biola University    ____________   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_program In chapter 3 of his book The Blind Watchmaker, biologist Richard Dawkins gave the following introduction to the program, referencing the well-known infinite monkey theorem.* I don't know who it wa
Post a Comment
Read more
Scientists Speak about Evolution This article was taken from the 3-volume set  Evolution Encyclopedia . Written over a 12-month period, the set is based on data in several hundred scientific papers and scholarly articles, as well as over 200 creationist books and journals. Secular scientists have a lot to say about evolutionary theory. Many of them thoroughly dislike it. The author collected thousands of statements by scientists (most of them non-creationists), arranged them in their logical categories, and connected them with comments. _________________________ Top-flight scientists have something to tell you about evolution. Such statements will never be found in the popular magazines, alongside gorgeous paintings of ape-man and Big Bangs and solemn pronouncements about millions of years for this rock and that fish. Instead they are generally reserved only for professional books and journals. Most scientists are working in very narrow fields; they do not see the overall p
1 comment
Read more